Video Clips taken off Youtube by TELUS under a false copyright claim: |
|
| Exhibit E (i) | These three songs are original works. TELUS does not own their copyright. |
| Exhibit E (ii) | These five videos are news reports about the lockout. TELUS does not own their copyright. |
| Exhibit E (iii) | These three videos are private home movies of rallies. TELUS does not own their copyright |
| Exhibit E (iv) | These three videos are private movies of AFI assaults. TELUS does not own their copyright. |
| Exhibit E (v) | Darren Entwistle on Cisco Systems and TELUS Idol. TELUS Idol is not copyrighted. It is not an original work and is filled with copyright infringements. |
| This was their application | |
| This was my response | |
| We agreed to file separate Case Management Conference Statements. | |
| This is their initial Case Management conference Statement | |
| This is my Case Management conference Statement | |
| Letter to TELUS' Board of Directors | |
| Case Conference December 13 2007 in San Francisco - Vacated | |
| Judge Walker wants to review the evidence. | |
| TELUS' Lawyer's Firm in San Francisco evades service of court documents by a California sheriff three times and refuses to accept substitute service. | |
| ADR Phone conference set for January 7 2008. | |
| Alternative Dispute Resolution Program | |
| January 7 2008 The parties agreed at the ADR phone conference to proceed to a Settlement Conference before a Magistrate Judge as opposed to proceeding through Mediation, Early Neutral Evaluation or Non Binding Arbitration. | |
| January 15 2008 Defendant granted permission to E-file documents | |
| January 16 2008 Defendant E-files Response, Case Management Statement and Motion to Dismiss / Motion to Strike | |
| January 23 2008 CLERK'S NOTICE Continuing Motion Hearing: Hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike scheduled for 3/20/2008 | |
| February 09 2008 Defendant files an Initial Brief | |
| February 28 2008 Plaintiff finally files an Opposition Brief, Affidavit and Proposed Order | |
| February 29 2008 Defendant files his Reply Brief | |
| March 30 2008 Judge Walker presided over the hearing on defendant's Motion to Dismiss over jurisdiction and Motion to Strike. Plaintiff agreed "TELUS' complaint covers only videos posted on Youtube." Opposition Brief page 9 line 14 and 15. Defendant agreed to Jurisdiction for the Youtube dispute. Hearing summary. | |
| April 11 2008 Defendant files Traverse and Exhibit "F" in preparation for trial. | |
| News | |
| T-Mobile sues TELUS for copyright infringement. TELUS stole the 'My Faves" promotion and called it "myFaves". Seemingly, since T-Mobile didn't register that name in Canada TELUS thinks they can steal it by registering it in Canada even though T-Mobile registered it in the U.S. first. Dirty deeds done dirt cheap. Speaking of dirty deeds done dirt cheap, TELUS Idol isn't copyrighted in the U.S. - It's not even copyrighted in Canada. Does that make it free game to post on Youtube? | |
| References | |
| Free Speech under the First Amendment and the Canadain Charter of rights | |
| Equal Protection Clause: "No State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." U.S. Constitution 14th Amendment I.E. Rich or Poor | |
| "Criminal sanctions for fraudulent copyright notice, fraudulent removal of copyright notice, and false representations in applications for copyright registration." | |
| Section 506(c) US Copyrigtht Act "Fraudulent Copyright Notice. — Any person who, with fraudulent intent, places on any article a notice of copyright or words of the same purport that such person knows to be false, or who, with fraudulent intent, publicly distributes or imports for public distribution any article bearing such notice or words that such person knows to be false, shall be fined not more than $2,500." | |
[EFF Bloggers Rights] [McLibel Case Law] [Copyfraud] [Rule 11 Discipline] |
|